Tuesday, 28 September 2010
The Marxist Approach
Karl Marx, the founder of Marxist theory believed that the media and its messages could be used for good in right hands. However, in the hands of what he called the Dominant Ideology the message could have a dangerously influential and controlling effect on the masses.
The Dominant Ideology
The ideological forces that determine how society functions. Marxists believe that all-powerful institutions subtly control how we, the masses, conduct our lives within society.
What are these dominant institutions?
These dominant and governing institutions range from organisations/ industries such as the Press, the Media, Television, Internet, Music industries etc. The Press being a vilification of some of those mentioned groups.
The Media’s Message
Marxists believe that the media plays a significant part in controlling the masses and some would say as an institution it is a greater influence on society than religion, politics and the family (nature over nurture). The supposed subtle dominance with which the media control the masses is also known as hegemonic control.
Hegemony
This was an ideological concept first introduced by Italian Marxist Antonio Gramsci. He believed that the media message could perform a subtle indoctrination, influencing the manner in which society viewed the world until the message becomes ‘common sense’, unchallenged by the masses. Hegemonic control is an acceptance of the ‘status quo’.
Lady Gaga - Paparazzi
The video has a long opening that all takes place without music, which is a very unconventional feat to a music video. Already the audience know to ‘expect the unexpected’ as the music video has already shifted and strayed past what you would consider to be a ‘traditional’ music video. This among many techniques also allows the video to appear much more cinematic and make the video appear almost more like a short movie than anything else. Another technique that does this would be the typography and the style of the font within the opening titles and subtitles, and the writing within the entire video in general.
Feedback
- notes on the key theoretical perspectives studied e.g. Marxism, post feminism
- upload evidence of planning work i.e. details of the track, genre, initial ideas and storyboard sections
Sunday, 26 September 2010
Friday, 24 September 2010
Kanye West - Flashing Lights
Unlike many other artists, Kanye West himself co-directed the video, along with Spike Jonze; and it was produced by Jonathan Becker and Joshua Greenberg. This music video was one of three that Kanye West had made for the song, however he favoured this one the most and decided to only release this one to the public and music channels (although the remaining two made prior to this were also leaked regardless).
It first starts off with a long shot of the desert and is used as an establishing shot of the area to keep the audience guessing as to what is actually going on and in suspense of what is to come. The video leaves little to the viewer to be strongly aware of the story at hand however such factors such as the setting being at night and taking place in a desert where the character(s) would be isolated, the slow motion to the video and the actual ambiguity and vagueness to the video already sub-consciously makes us feel uneasy and we become slightly aware of the sinister tone that the video possesses.
Due to the video being very ambiguous we as the audience can never truly know what’s happening and the plot behind the story since we are directly thrown into the action and are not directly informed as to what’s going on, so the director of the video has intentions of leaving the viewer completely in suspense and uncertainty and leaves us guessing.
Although it is not directly told to us what is happening, the director does form enough of a structured plot to the video that we the viewer can be able to make certain guesses and interpretations to what they think is happening, therefore we can take a very open-minded view to it and form an opinion based from our own analysis. An approach such as this is ever so rarely seen in music videos in general, yet alone a hip hop music video and therefore I do believe the director attempted for a very unique direction for the video.
I believe the director intended the video to be both aimed at satisfying the male and female audience as we have the male gaze at hand here where we see a very attractive woman who is dressed in very little, being of an existent character in the video. On the other hand this character also satisfies the female audience as she can represent a more post-feminist portrayal of a ‘sexy woman’ who can yet still call the shots. This is because throughout the entirety of the video the audience is always aware of who is in power here, which is her and nobody else. She is pretty much the only visible character throughout most of the video and therefore she dictates the camera and the audience into seeing her and only her. To exemplify upon this we also see the camera make many panning motions towards her, and there are tracking shots used on her to illustrate just how mighty and powerful she really is and how much attention is needed on her. It again shows how she gains authority over the camera, as a shot in particular shows her walking to a certain area and while there is so much space placed in front of her she still manages to be the only figure visible on screen.
The song in general has a very dark tone to it, and everything ranging from the beat of the song to the lyrics help portray it in a more pessimistic and darker light. Therefore she is also presented in great darkness within many of the shots in the video, which reveals her in a silhouette form and brings a very sinister and mysterious feel to her.
There is a shot where she throws a lighter in the air for it to land on her clothes that she just rid of to burn them, and we see her walking towards us (the camera) while the flames are burning behind her, and this already creates a vicious and monstrous persona to the character and presents her as being very menacing.
When we see her walking towards us however she never looks at the camera and that also tells us that she is in demand and very authoritative as the camera needs to be on focus to her, yet she hasn’t got a care in the world for the camera or us. This shot happens to be in a medium close up form and therefore we acknowledge the detail needed on her as we can see the motions she is making and notice she is walking to a certain direction, and this accompanied with the point of view shots her head is facing in allows us to understand that she has some sort of goal and needs to go back to the car as it has more significance than we may have initially thought.
By her walking towards the camera it means the camera also has to back away from her, pointing out how threatened we are supposed to feel by her presence. The video being in slow motion not only creates a very dramatic feel for it, but also makes her appear almighty and grand because her movements are slow yet still inevitable and sure, and so she almost seems like an unstoppable force who has an aim that we the audience know nothing about, yet can only watch unfold and do nothing in our power to stop.
It is not only the many camera and editing techniques that make this character be presented as so powerful and in demand, but also her actions as we see that she has the man, Kanye West, tied up in the boot and therefore helpless. It shows that she does indeed hold the authority in the video and even a man whom would be typically be portrayed as the more dominant force, especially in a hip hop video, is weak, feeble and powerless to protect himself of her wrath and unable to stop her motives and prevent herself from achieving her goals.
When we see her forcefully ram a prop, being a shovel, into Kanye West repeatedly we develop the view of fear we have upon her and recognise how much of a villainous character she really is. As the camera pans away from the boot and the car, we don’t actually literally see the shovel being thrust into Kanye West’s body and this makes her appear even more evil and cruel as the camera seems to not want to show us the gruesome details of our actions, making us fear the woman more and being more frightened and terrified of her.
When closely analysing the music video myself, I have come to a rough and opinionated conclusion that perhaps Kanye West and the woman in the video were once lovers. However he wronged her by most likely committing adultery/ having an affair and committing infidelity and therefore she found out about it and is punishing him (murdering him) because of it. If that is the case then it creates for a very intriguing plot as it portrays such a villainous character whom is doing the wrong things however is not all entirely to blame as the person she had once loved wronged her first. It portrays the woman as being somewhat twisted and psychotic however as she is going through such drastic lengths just to hurt him back, as she is even willing to take his life because of it.
We know that there must have been some sort of affection between the two as just before she starts stabbing Kanye West with a shovel, she kisses him in the cheek. That not only displays a possibly existent love-life between the couple, it also emphasizes on just how disturbing of a character and twisted she is, because she is placidly able to make a transition of making a gesture of love to him to instantly making more than just a gesture of sheer hate and detest.
In conclusion I found that I had mixed thoughts over the video. I believe it is an incredibly unique type of video especially when considering what genre it is for, however the extent of the ambiguity and obscurity to the video acts almost like a double-edged sword for it. It allows the audience to make their own interpretations to the video to a certain degree, however it leaves too much for the audience to guess and arguably lacks enough depth for a narrative in order for a viewer to thoroughly understand what is happening. Overall the pros may indeed still outweigh the cons and the dark nature to the video can leave a sense of macabre to it where we the audience still have a certain interest into the gruesome events in the video, and our interest is still pertained due to this.
Tuesday, 14 September 2010
Thursday, 9 September 2010
Ciara - Like A Boy
At the start of the video we see an extreme close up of Ciara’s arms and hands and see various tattoos on them plus rings on her fingers too. The video is already drawing us in and pointing out to us the twist and subversion to the typical woman we may find in videos. It zooms out and we see a mid-shot of Ciara saying “2007, ladies I think its time to switch roles”. By the mid-shot allowing us to recognise her appearance more thoroughly and by what she says, we as the audience can understand she has attained not only a dominant persona, but also rather masculine one too as this is exemplified through her mise-en-scene features such as the attire and tattoos, which we would stereotypically associate with only the male artists.
Ciara portraying a male however by dressing up somewhat like on, and her posture and appearance allows her to mimic a typical black male/rapper and also portrays her as being more powerful as her character does not seem to display passiveness that illustrates a damsel in distress, but more so a person with a sturdy presence and can handle herself.
Feminist & Post Feminist Readings
Britney Spears - Toxic (Feminist Reading only)
- Stereotypical - Woman presented very sexual and provocative, regardless of her being the main protagonist
- Very promiscuous & provocative- Coffee poured on man's crotch area/ She rubs her bottom on man's crotch
- Sexual object - Her range of revealing outfits
- Typical feminine occupations (Air Hostess/ domestic work)
- She is not riding the motorcycle but riding behind the man - Not taking charge/ Women need protection by men
- Diamond dress barely covers her body - Exploiting women's bodies
- Representation of male on plane is more realistic of that to women
- Chameleon effect of Britney Spears - Has to use her image rather than talent. Demeans herself/ could possibly reveal artist's low self esteem
- Shows sex sells
Pussycat Dolls - Buttons (Post Feminist Reading only)
- Offer messages of sexual empowerment - Assertive, provocative and in control of 'the gaze (male)'
- Confident, sassy, sexy icons challenging traditional assumptions about passive female sexuality "I'm a sexy marma"
- Uses a provocative male address challenging Snoop to "loosen up" her "buttons" - However, the dolls prove 'too hot to handle' for Snoop
However there are also counter examples to this, of a Post-Feminist type of video.
Missy Elliot's 'She's a Bitch', is an example of this.
- It rejects conventional representations of women- free from objectification
- Does not conform to stereotypical gender representations
- Missy is not passive; she 'narrates' the action - lyrics are not self exploiting
- Androgyny: Masculine codes of movement, stance and dress
- Mise en scene- She wears man tailored suits/ shirt and tie/ dungarees/ army wear
- Subverts gender codes - Use of male dancers; Missy displays a 'male' persona - drives fast car, wears the 'bling' etc
- Body image refuses to conform to idealised female stereotypes - Missy is literally inflated in her video of 'The Rain (Supa Dupa Fly)'
Gender Stereotypes/ Feminism and Post Feminism
Gender Stereotypes in Music
*Men are engaged significantly more aggressive and dominant behaviour
*Men are represented as independent, adventurous, unemotional and competent.
*Stereotypical gendered occupations are apparent i.e. Men as fire-fighters/Mechanics, and females as waitresses/cheerleaders
*Women are engaged with significantly more unimportant roles and are usually involved in more explicit, sexual and passive behaviour.
*Women are represented as objects of sexual advances or as sexual objects
-Women are more likely to wear revealing and provocative clothing.
-Women are portrayed as decorative objects that may dance, pose yet may have less overall input like not playing instrumentsThese research findings were not restricted to the hip hop genre only
Feminism (1960s/1970s)
*A movement in which women questioned their position within patriarchal society & the 'private sphere' of home/children/domestic bliss.
*Serves to uncover, challenge and eliminate oppression and dominant gender imagery
*Women began to debate the narrow range of stereotypes across all media
*Women were seen as either virgins, mothers or promiscuous
*Women were seen as sexual objects
*Women are depicted as being inferior to men
*Women are viewed as domestic/based in the home
Sexual Objectification and the Male Gaze (Laura Mulvey)
*Definition of Voyeurism: Erotic pleasures gained from looking at a sexual object (who is unaware of being watched)
*Presence of women solely for the purpose of display (rather than narrative function)
*Female on display is passive and objectified for a male gaze regardless of viewers gender
*Voyeuristic treatment of female body in 'male' videos- use of dancers as adornments to the male ego
*The inclusion of women for women for display is a staple element in music video's- across all genres
*Women connote to-be-looked-at-ness and are the object of the male gaze
Post Feminism (& Introduction of the Female Gaze)
(1980s)
*A re-appraisal of Feminist values
*Does not strive for 'equality' as this assumes men are 'the best'- they wish to surpass male achievements
*Objected to theories which position them as objects of the 'male gaze'
*Identifies a 'female gaze'- women actively desiring men Women began to assert their right to dress and be sexually attractive as long as they maintain control and solid composure.
Wednesday, 8 September 2010
Basement Jaxx - Where's your head at
The concept of this video generates a weird and bizarre reality where it seems as if the main character has been somehow thrown into an illusionary world that doesn’t actually exist (the “armpit of nowhere” as he calls it – ironically he refers it to as an armpit allowing it to convey filthier, polluted connotations than anything else). Experiments have been produced by scientists and are enabling monkeys to be slowly, but surely, transforming into human beings, as we start to see the monkeys develop human faces/ traits. This concept corresponds to the title of the song as it relates to the questionable events that are taking place and exposes the unordinary monkeys that exist in the video. The scientists are supposedly trying to make the monkeys develop musical traits that are only shared through humans as in the beginning of the video the main character says the scientist claims to have the “latest thing in pop music”. There is a man with a guitar in a stretcher, and this is foreboding of what is to come in the video. To that we are immediately introduced to the song. After a short while we see the monkeys arrive to the scene and start playing various instruments such as a guitar and DJ decks etc. Close up shots of the monkeys are shown in order to capture the hilarity and strangeness of them having human faces and playing the instruments.
Later we see the monkeys begin to lose control and instead of playing the instruments, they begin to start eating on them instead. They first start lashing out in a wild outbreak and violently sing along with the chorus. It correlates well with the monkeys as it is a very up-beat, rough and loud, which makes it have a strong synchronisation between the audio and video since the monkeys also begin acting very rough, brash and angry. There is a foretelling of what is shortly to come when we see one monkey put it’s hands on its head in anxiety and the scientist does the same. As the monkeys start to tear the room/ equipment up out of their own frustration and instinct, so does the scientist.
I believe there could possibly be subtle intertextuality throughout the music video as there are faint relations to the story of ‘Planet of the Apes’. Many references to the movie apply here through the obvious ideas of primates taking over and becoming the new, dominant race but also we have the main character seem to find himself in somewhat of another world as do to his arrival he spoke of the place as the “armpit of nowhere”.
I consider this to be a very successful video as although the plot of it may not make total sense it still remains with strong amusement, technically impressive and leaving the audience to marvel in awe at what they are watching and above all else it is also incredibly unique and takes a different approach rarely seen in various music videos allowing itself to become special and memorable among many.